I do understand the emotion of a poet who claims that it is not necessary for him to be
understood by every reader. But it is obviously wrong, because poetry must be sufficiently
furnished with a logic as words at least to be possessed in common amongst human and the
words can not stand on the place where the communication does not exists. I think that the
poets are now facing such a stage that they must get back the independence of words by
their own power and spirit.
(As I am thinking on the other hand that such a horrifying world of cannibalism of
everyday affairs where people kill other people must not be.)